Hosted by Pair Networks

« Must See Asian Cinema | Main | The Romantics Sue Guitar Hero, But Legends of Rock Keeps on Shredding »

The Savior of Star Wars

A lament you constantly hear in Hollywood is today’s lack of risk-taking, and how so many great movies from the ‘70’s wouldn’t get made today. As odd as it to believe, Star Wars was a risky project that no one knew the potential of until late in the game. Recently, Variety celebrated the studio executive whose faith in George Lucas got Star Wars made, and it would be just one of many film gambles he was willing to make throughout his career.

Alan Ladd Jr. is of course the son of Alan Ladd, and the offspring of the famous Hollywood legend has made his own place in Hollywood history. He joined 20th Century Fox in 1973, and became president in 1976. Fox had a number of ups and downs throughout its history, most notoriously with the big budget Elizabeth Taylor debacle Cleopatra, which almost put the studio out of business. By the time Ladd became studio president, Fox was back on the upswing with the success of Mel Brooks’ Silent Movie, and The Omen.

Yet before the massive success of Star Wars, science fiction was considered a limited genre that didn’t “crossover” to everyone. Not to mention the outline for the film made no sense on paper. Both Universal and United Artists passed on it. Former Universal head of production Ned Tanen recalled in the Lucas biography, Skywalking, “I had a very tough time understanding the treatment. I would ask most people in the world to visualize what See-Threepio means from reading a thirteen-page treatment of Star Wars.”
star_wars_poster.jpg

The sci-fi genre was especially anathema to Universal. As former Universal president Thom Mount recalls, the patriarch of the company, Lew Wasserman, “had turned down Star Wars famously at Universal. After American Graffiti, Lucas was obligated to offer his next picture to us, so he brought Star Wars to the company. Mr. Wasserman read it, and his words were very simple: ‘We don’t make science fiction movies.’ End of conversation. The company didn’t really do much science fiction. We dabbled around the edges here and there, but since Lew didn’t like it as a genre, we didn’t pursue it very hard.”

Less than a week after Universal officially passed on Star Wars, it was set up at Fox. Having seen American Graffiti three months before its release, Ladd loved the film, and was willing to bet on Lucas before he was a proven commodity at the box office. Ultimately, the film would make $55.1 million on a total budget of $1,275,000. Before the Blair Witch Project, Graffiti was reportedly the most successful film in history in terms of what it cost, and how much money it made back.

Most couldn’t see the vision of Star Wars until the film was complete, which would make any studio executive nervous, but as Ladd told us, “Star Wars is a classic good against evil story. Those have always proven to be winners, and if George could pull off half of what he talked about…He described it in terms of Robin Hood and Buck Rogers, which I was very familiar with. I knew he was striking new territory, and I just believed in him. And I believed that if anybody could ever pull it off it would be him.

“I feel a great sense of pride that I was involved in Star Wars,” Ladd continues. “It helped establish me in the business, and gave me a stronger reputation that I had the courage to say yes to it.”
ladd.jpg
Above: Alan Ladd Jr.

Where a lot of studio executives constantly meddle movies into mediocrity, Ladd was an executive who liked films and filmmakers, and let them follow their hearts. He told Variety, “My biggest contribution to Star Wars was keeping my mouth shut and standing by the picture.”

Once Star Wars became a monster hit, it allowed Ladd to green-light smaller, riskier movies that didn’t always have the biggest audience potential, but if the budgets stayed low, he’d leave you alone. If a picture flopped, it didn’t cost the studio that much, but if it was a hit, the rewards could be huge.

Screenwriter Tom Mankiewicz (Superman, Live and Let Die), took a dark comedy, Mother, Juggs and Speed, to Fox, with Peter Yates (Bullitt) directing. Ladd told them, “If you guys can make this for $3 million, go make it and I won’t interfere with anything.” It didn’t do blockbuster business, but The Omen, which Richard Donner had to make on a tight $2 million dollar budget, became a big smash.
the_omen.jpg

In the notorious directors of the ‘70’s tell-all, Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, Robert Altman recalled showing Ladd Three Women, a film he had just completed starring Sissy Spacek and Shelley Duvall. At the end of the screening, Ladd told the director, “Well, I don’t know who you think you’re going to sell this picture to, but good luck.”

When Ladd left Fox and formed the Ladd Company, he continued making edgy films like Blade Runner, which didn’t do well during its initial release but is a classic today, and Star 80, the bleak Bob Fosse movie about murdered centerfold Dorothy Stratten. Just as Star Wars provided the money that could fund smaller films, the Ladd Company had a big hit with Police Academy, which as Ladd told Variety, “paid the rent so we could afford to do other things.”

These days, with so much money at stake, risks are not encouraged at major studios. Everyone wants to think they’re players, but no one wants to roll the dice. “In my time, I was very lucky that I had creative control and I could make decisions like that,” says Ladd. “Now you’ve got fifty accountants all sitting around a table trying to make a decision. That’s why you get so much crap now, because nobody’s putting their individual input into taking chances on something. They’re all trying to play it so safe, but when you try to play it safe you’re not going to make anything interesting at all.”

We at Tom’s salute you Laddie, and we wish there were more like you out there.


Comments (5)

Den Holmes:

This is sooooooooo right on. Now that accountants run Hollywood, you get movies like Pearl Harbor or Mission Impossible 1-2-3), that seem as if they were written with a grocery list of characters and plot points (hero? check! best friend? check! love interest? check! sweet minor character that gets killed off? check!, explosions? check! bigger explosions? check! etc. etc.) and every supposedly scary movie is just a clone of all the other "scary" movies. The exceptions are usually foreign films or smaller projects (I give George Clooney props for Goodnight, and Good Luck!). Alan Ladd had a great idea. Let creative filmmakers make their films.
Thanks Alan!

spudboy:

great article...it's nice to remember the days when studios would take a risk in hopes it would pay off at some point. the worst thing about living from then to now is seeing Hollywood turn into a "remake machine." hardly any originals anymore, just worse sequels of bad movies or nauseating remakes of TV series or old movies as "star vehicles". i hardly go to cinemas anymore except for the occasional big-screen movie that looks best in large scale. add to this being scalped at the box office just for the opportunity to see that big scale...it's no wonder cinema is slowly going the way of the recording industry.

i'm really saddened by the way this elevation of profit above everything else is steadily degrading the really great aspects of culture and country. my hope is that it drives people to create on their own in a DIY fashion on a wider scale and that technological advances allow us to enjoy the fruits of their creativity without the bloodsucking middlemen inserting themselves between creator and audience. this seems to be the way things are going out of necessity.

eruwen:

We're witnessing the downfall of Hollywood. The atmosphere there doesn't encourage originality. It gets trampled on by formulaic plots. Gone are the days of Citizen Kane or Psycho or American Graffiti...or the ORIGINAL Star Wars Trilogy. It is pitiful that original ideas have to be brought up somewhere (e.g. The Ring came from Ringu, the upcoming movie Echo from the Filipino movie Sigaw, etc.). Whatever happened to the good stuff that Hollywood produces?

Mark:

Great movies are made all the time. They just aren't marketed main stream. Using Netflix has really let the wife and I explore what is out there.

Tony:

I COMPLETELY disagree with the previous posts. Hollywood is far beyond this cookie-cutter theme you guys are implying. I mean, have you watched any movies lately??

Come on guys, you give Hollywood too much credit. Everyone knows that there is a master computer program that monitors the lead stories throughout America for the mainstream viewers, determines what genre and theme to set the movie in, and it goes on IMDB to determine which actors to hire for which parts (which are decided based on theme and genre, plus target audience).

Nobody sits back and thinks about these things!! Again, you give Hollywood way too much credit.

P.S. Exceptions - Disney Princess movies. They do actually just have a "grocery list" of events and characters to fill in.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Fringe Drinking is part of Bestofmedia LLC